Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mania Premium Outlet International Dr. LLC et al v. OR Mania USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv60054
Defendant:
OR MANIA USA, INC., OR MANIA LTD., OREN IFRAH and others
Plaintiff:
ELIOR PEREZ, MANIA FLORIDA MALL, LLC, CYNTHIA CHOWDHURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hamilton LC, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10846
Plaintiff:
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. and LC Trademarks, Inc.
Defendant:
Hamilton LC, LLC, Rising Sun LC, LLC, Latimer LC, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Fifth Street LC, LLC and Lancaster Ave LC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Mania Premium Outlet International Dr. LLC et al v. Perez et al
as 0:2021cv60053
Defendant:
Elior Perez, OR Mania Ltd., OR Mania USA, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Noizz Florida Mall, LLC
Plaintiff:
Noizz Premium Outlet International Dr. LLC, Mania Florida Mall, LLC, Cynthia Chowdhury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Restored Images Consulting, LLC v. Dr. Vinyl & Associates, Limited
as 4:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Restored Images Consulting, LLC
Defendant:
Dr. Vinyl & Associates, Limited
Third_party_plaintiff:
Dr. Vinyl & Associates, Limited
Third_party_defendant:
Christopher Collins
Counter_claimant:
Dr. Vinyl & Associates, Limited
Counter_defendant:
Restored Images Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medicine Shoppe International, Inc. v. Swartout et al
as 4:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Medicine Shoppe International, Inc.
Defendant:
Savannah B. Swartout and S.B.S. Pill Dr., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gold's Gym Franchising, LLC v. Dr. Fitness of Boynton Beach, LLC et al
as 9:2009cv81110
Plaintiff:
Gold's Gym Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Dr. Fitness of Boynton Beach, LLC, Dominic Paris and Ron Ostroff
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
