Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00085
Defendant:
1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.87 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Sara Stahlschmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.47 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01533
Defendant:
Mississippi River Transmission Corporation, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, St. Louis County Missouri American Water Company and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.04 Acre, More or Less, in Nelson County, VA, Located on Parcel Identification No. 81-A-58 et al
as 3:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
Unknown Heirs of Hester Belle Woodson, Gloria Woodson, 0.04 Acre, More or Less, in Nelson County, VA, Located on Parcel Identification No. 81-A-58 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.11 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01391
Defendant:
0.01 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, The Margaret G. Bell Revocable Living Trust, Dated July 11, 2002, Collector of Revenue of St. Louis County and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.55 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01361
Defendant:
Shell Pipe Line Corporation, 0.77 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 4.70 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01356
Defendant:
Central Bank of St. Louis, 2.58 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, City of Portage des Sioux and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.69 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01333
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 0.55 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.92 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01332
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 0.73 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.48 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.69 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01335
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 0.55 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.67 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01344
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 1.67 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Dennis H. Schaeffer as Trustee of the Virginia A. Schaeffer Trust Dated March 2, 1995 and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
