Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 11 - 14 of 14
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. A Permanent Easement for 0.901 Acres and Temporary Easements for 2.374 Acres in Bethany Borough and Dyberry Township, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel Number 09-0-0006-0001 et al
as 3:2011cv00192
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
Defendant: A Permanent Easement for 0.901 Acres and Temporary Easements for 2.374 Acres in Bethany Borough and Dyberry Township, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel Number 09-0-0006-0001, Edward F. Meyer, Glass Pond One Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. A Permanent Easement for 0.823 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.676 Acres in Clinton Township, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel Number 06-1-0211-0024 Belmont Turnpike et al
as 3:2011cv00194
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
Defendant: A Permanent Easement for 0.823 Acres and Temporary Easements for 4.676 Acres in Clinton Township, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel Number 06-1-0211-0024 Belmont Turnpike, Walter J. Hamlyn, Jr., Margaret Hamlyn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States Of America v. 11.51 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Wayne County, State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2007cv00195
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: 11.51 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Wayne County, State of North Carolina and Nan B. Montague
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condemnation
USA v. Certain land, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1979cv73934
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Certain land situated in the City of Detroit, Wayne County, State of Michigan , Detroit International Bridge Company , Roy G. Lancaster and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Commodities Export Company and Walter H. Lubinski

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?