Cases 1 - 4 of 4
United States of America v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.37 acre of Land, More or Less, and additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Clinton County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way over 0.37 acre of Land, More or Less, and additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Clinton County, Kentucky, Luther C. Conner, Jr. and Susan Conner
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Actions re: rights of Tennessee Valley Authority
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement of 0.36 Acre +- in Towamensing Township, Carbon County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 16D-56-A28 et al
as 3:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement of 0.36 Acre +- in Towamensing Township, Carbon County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 16D-56-A28 , Shane M. Conner , Diane C. Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC v. 0.569 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Polk County, Florida et al
as 8:2016cv00667
Plaintiff:
Florida Southeast Connection, LLC
Defendant:
0.569 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Polk County, Florida and Daryl H. Conner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Temporary easements totaling 1.794 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Mecklenburg County, Virginia of approximately 98.75 acres in size, as more particularly described herein et al
as 3:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
Temporary easements totaling 1.794 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Mecklenburg County, Virginia of approximately 98.75 acres in size, as more particularly described herein and Melissa B. Conner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
