Cases 31 - 40 of 59
U.S. Bank National Associates v. Langlotz et al
as 3:2016cv02066
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Associates
Defendant:
Mathias Langlotz and Michelle Langlotz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Soledad M. Solano et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09718
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, LaSalle Bank, NA, Randal D. Naiman and others
Plaintiff:
Nana I-Am and Soledad M. Solano
U.S. Bank National Association v. Coombs et al
as 2:2015cv08610
Defendant:
Courtney Coombs, Does and Jeff Toland
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
U.S. Bank National Association v. Charles H. Ware et al
as 2:2015cv04173
Defendant:
Does and Charles H Ware
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Duck v. Scott et al
as 2:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
William I Duck
Defendant:
Mike Scott and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
U.S. Bank NA v. Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv02685
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank NA
Defendant:
Carol Darlene Johnson, Unknown Johnson and Unknown Parties
Movant:
Daniel Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Simons et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 3:2014cv02138
Plaintiff:
Shelden M. Simons, Charles Simons and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Bank National Association v. Oyedokun et al
as 1:2014cv00732
Defendant:
Ebony Oyedokun and Michael O. Oyedokun, Jr.
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
U.S. Bank National Association v. Concepcion Calvillo et al
as 2:2013cv04933
Defendant:
Concepcion Calvillo, Does and Tubrisa Rowin
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
U.S. Bank National Association v. Joseph Graham, Tamara Vaughn, et al
as 5:2013cv00406
Defendant:
Joseph Graham and Tamara Vaughn
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
