Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hooper et al v. Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank,
as 3:2021cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hooper and Tiffany Hooper
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B H P Billiton Petroleum Properties (N A) L P et al v. Caspiana Minerals L L C et al
as 5:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
BHP Billiton Petroleum (TXLA Operating) Company, BHP Billiton Petroleum Properties (N.A.), L.P., B P X Properties (N A) L P and others
Defendant:
MRC Energy Company, Leslie Hooper Roche, MAP2001-NET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
B P X Properties (N A) L P et al v. Moss & Magnolia L L C et al
as 5:2021cv00289
Defendant:
Colbert Lands, LLC, Leslie Hooper Roche, Robert Campbell Hutchinson and others
Plaintiff:
BPX Properties (NA) LP, BPX (KCS Resources), LLC, B P X Properties (N A) L P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
RGB Realty Limited v. Hooper et al
as 6:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
RGB Realty Limited
Defendant:
James Hooper, Nancy Hooper, Robert Sawney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Ibanez, Jr. et al v. Chase Bank et al
as 7:2013cv00293
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Ibanez, Jr. and Isabel Ibanez
Defendant:
Chase Bank , Monty Medly, Connie Medly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RITA T. HOOPER AND LOUIS G. HOOPER AS TRUSTEES OF THE GORDON HOOPER REAL ESTATE, INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN
as 2:2008at00356
Plaintiff:
RITA T. HOOPER AND LOUIS G. HOOPER AS TRUSTEES OF THE GORDON HOOPER REAL ESTATE, INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN, RITA T. HOOPER AND LOUIS G. HOOPER AS TRUSTEES OF THE GORDON HOOPER REAL ESTATE, INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN and RITA T. HOOPER AND LOUIS G. HOOPER AS TRUSTEES OF THE GORDON HOOPER REAL ESTATE, INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
