Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Smith v. United States, et al
as 1:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Smith
Defendant:
United States, Westwego Police, Big L's Building Materials and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BEARD v SEALS, et.al
as 1:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE S. BEARD
Defendant:
KOBIE SEALS and MICHAEL BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
VURIMINDI v. BARTON et al
as 1:2012cv01223
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Defendant:
BARNS BARTON, ROBERT BALL, NATHANIEL HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Glaser v. Barnes et al
as 8:2012cv02706
Plaintiff:
Gary Glaser
Defendant:
Ivy Barnes
Garnishee:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Randall Goulding v. Leslie Weiss, et al
as 12-2523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL S. GOULDING
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE WEISS, BARNES & THORNBURG, ALAN D. LASKO and others
Hoffman v. McCarthy
as 1:2012cv01609
Plaintiff:
Wendy J Hoffman
Defendant:
Robin Barnes McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al
as 11-7135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Parisi, Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence W Sinclair, also known as Larry Sinclair, Jeffrey Rense, Barnes & Noble, Inc. and others
Goulding v. Weiss et al
as 1:2011cv05354
Plaintiff:
Randall S Goulding
Defendant:
Leslie Weiss , Barnes & Thornburg LLP , Alan D Lasko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al
as 11-7077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Parisi, Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network Llc and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence W. Sinclair, also known as Larry Sinclair, Jeffrey Rense, Barnes & Noble Inc and others
Skypeople Fruit Juice Inc v. Absaroka Capital Management LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Skypeople Fruit Juice Inc
Defendant:
Absaroka Capital Management LLC and Kevin Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
