Cases 31 - 38 of 38
LILL v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03180
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LILL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. and JANE DOE 1-100
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
QUIGLEY v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03181
Plaintiff:
KEVIN QUIGLEY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. and "JANE DOE 1-100
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
INFERMO v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02498
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. and JANE DOE 1-100
Plaintiff:
PHILIP INFERMO
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
REEVES v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv02499
Plaintiff:
PERRY REEVES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. and JANE DOE 1-100
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Polanco v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv01705
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Bienvenido Polanco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LOBYCZ v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT OPERATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05610
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOBYCZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT OPERATIONS, INC., ELIZABETH SACCONE, ELISA SACCONE and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Loza et al v. Native American Air Ambulance, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01001
Plaintiff:
Cindy Loza and Carlos Loza
Defendant:
Native American Air Ambulance, Inc., James McConnell, Jane Doe McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Burnside et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv00436
Plaintiff:
Benjamin B Burnside and Juan Cruz Torralva
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
