Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Watson v. Heerema Marine Contractors Nederland B.V.
as 2:2010cv01073
Plaintiff:
James Pierson Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Heerema Marine Contractors Nederland B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Heerema Marine Contractors Nederland B.V.
as 2:2010cv00491
Plaintiff:
James Pierson Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Heerema Marine Contractors Nederland B.V.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104 Marine Personal Injury
FIOCCA et al v. SEATRADE GRONINGEN, B.V. et al
as 2:2009cv03565
Plaintiff:
JAMES FIOCCA and AMY FIOCCA
Defendant:
SEATRADE GRONINGEN, B.V. and BV SHIPPING COMPANY LOMBOK STRAIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Chemium International Corp. v. M/T Stolt Spray, Stolt Tankers Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv03572
Plaintiff:
Chemium International Corp.
Defendant:
M/T Stolt Spray, Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group B.V. and Stolt Tankers Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sunrise Medical,Inc. et al v. CEVA Ocean Line
as 4:2008cv00502
Plaintiff:
Sunrise Medical,Inc., Sunrise Medical,Inc., Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc. and others
Defendant:
CEVA Ocean Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Caddell Consltruction Company Inc v. M/V MAERSK MADRID et al
as 4:2007cv02313
Plaintiff:
Caddell Consltruction Company Inc
Defendant:
M/V MAERSK MADRID, P&O Nedlloyd B.V., Maersk Ship Management B.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
EVANS et al v. SEATRADE GRONINGEN B.V. et al
as 1:2007cv03139
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EVANS and AMANDA EVANS
Defendant:
SEATRADE GRONINGEN B.V., BV SHIPPING COMPANY LOMBOK STRAIT and NETWORK SHIPPING LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones v. Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00164
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones and Edward Jones
Defendant:
Stolt Perseverance B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Marine Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
