Cases 41 - 50 of 93
WOODS v. FATA et al
as 1:2020cv02221
Defendant:
EMPLOYER I-X, MECHANIC I-X, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN P. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
WOODS v. FATA et al
as 3:2020cv02221
Defendant:
EMPLOYER I-X, MECHANIC I-X, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN P. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HANSEN v. LAPP et al
as 3:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARIE KJAER HANSEN and YOUTH WITH A MISSION, INC.
Defendant:
"JOHN DOE"(S) 1-10, "ABC CORPORATION"(S) A-Z AND 1-10 and DOMINQUE COLIN LAPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HONG v. FIELDS et al
as 2:2020cv01570
Plaintiff:
JANG SICK HUNG and JANG SICK HONG
Defendant:
S&S AFFILIATES, JUSTIN FIELDS, JOHN DOE(S) #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
HANSEN v. LAPP et al
as 2:2019cv05261
Plaintiff:
MARIE KJAER HANSEN
Defendant:
DOMINQUE COLIN LAPP, "JOHN DOE"(S) 1-10, "ABC CORPORATION"(S) A-Z AND 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SQUAREWELL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2019cv12196
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, HERMAN BARON, ABC CORPORATION(S) 1-10 (FICTITIOUS DEFENDANTS) and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS SQUAREWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Britt et al v. Gary Moore Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mitzi Britt
Defendant:
John Doe(s) 1-5, John Doe Entity(ies) 1-5, Gary Moore Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sullivan v. Turner et al
as 1:2018cv00207
Defendant:
Dalton Turner, John Doe Person(s) 1-5, Ari Fleet, Lt and others
Plaintiff:
Kamiyun Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. CROSBY et al
as 3:2018cv14217
Defendant:
KEVIN T. MONINGHOFF, DONALD G. CROSBY and JOHN DOE(S) (1-4)
Plaintiff:
DIANETTE B. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. MONTENEGRO
as 1:2018cv09563
Plaintiff:
AJA SMITH
Defendant:
AMANDA MONTENEGRO and JOHN DOE(S) 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
