Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cheung v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08899
Plaintiff:
Chi How Cheung
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC and Rasier-NY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Campbell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv07493
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Benjamin Cheung, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Campbell et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv07429
Plaintiff:
Mr. Mark A. Campbell and United States Postal Service
Defendant:
Benjamin Cheung and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Byun v. Tutor Perini Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
Euija Byun
Defendant:
Henry K. Cheung and Tutor Perini Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. Cheung Cheung et al
as 1:2013cv02173
Defendant:
Kee Cheung Cheung and Thunder Group New York, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Julio Raymundo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rodriguez v. Cheung Cheung et al
as 1:2012cv09246
Plaintiff:
Julio Raymundo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kee Cheung Cheung and Thunder Group New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BURNETTE et al v. CHEUNG et al
as 2:2011cv04665
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE BURNETTE and ELLEN BURNETTE
Defendant:
ADAM R. CHEUNG, MALCOLM A. CHEUNG, JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheung v. Morrow Trucking Inc.
as 4:2011cv00525
Plaintiff:
Glenn Cheung
Defendant:
Morrow Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FROMAL v. TAI EXPRESS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv03888
Plaintiff:
GARY FROMAL
Defendant:
TAI EXPRESS, INCORPORATED and DONG CHEUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
