Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Powell et al v. Hampton et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Salina Powell and James R Young
Defendant:
Brian Ashley Hampton and Michael Todd Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Odom v. Loman et al
as 1:2022cv05144
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Odom
Defendant:
Daniel Lee Loman and Crown Equipment Corporation doing business as Crown Lift Trucks
Not Classified By Court:
Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois
Cross Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Albergaria v. Windsor et al
as 5:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Diane A. Albergaria
Defendant:
Erik Balboa, United States of America and Michael Todd Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Leeson v. Sunbelt Furniture Xpress, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00106
Defendant:
Michael Todd Adkins, Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. and Sunbelt Furniture Xpress, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Leeson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross v. Sunbelt Furniture Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03730
Plaintiff:
Randy Ross
Defendant:
Sunbelt Furniture Xpress, Inc. , 305 Trucking, Inc., Michael Todd Kale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leeson v. Sunbelt Furniture Xpress, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Eric Leeson
Defendant:
Sunbelt Furniture Xpress, Inc. , Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. and Michael Todd Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albergaria v. Windsor et al
as 5:2015cv01144
Plaintiff:
Diane A Albergaria
Defendant:
Mr. Erik Balboa, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Mr. Michael Todd Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jenkins v. American Safety Indemnity Co
as 5:2011cv00538
Defendant:
American Safety Indemnity Co , Rodrigues & Son Logging and Michael Todd
Plaintiff:
William Jenkins
Consol_plaintiff:
Cristin Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
