Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pantoja v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01755
Plaintiff:
Pilaar Pantoja
Defendant:
United States of America: Federal Agency-U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
PANTOJA v. JERICH INTERNATIONAL et al
as 3:2019cv18147
Defendant:
JERICH USA INC., J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., ABC COMPANIES, INC. 1 - 100 (FICTITIOUS NAMES) and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. PANTOJA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PANTOJA v. JERICH INTERNATIONAL et al
as 2:2019cv18147
Defendant:
JERICH USA INC., J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., ABC COMPANIES, INC. 1 - 100 (FICTITIOUS NAMES) and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. PANTOJA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pantoja v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01371
Plaintiff:
Pilaar Pantoja
Defendant:
United States of America and Anthony Stack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PANTOJAS v. QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS CO.
as 2:2017cv04809
Plaintiff:
EDDIE PANTOJAS
Defendant:
QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melendez-Ramirez et al v. Tovar
as 2:2017cv02013
Defendant:
Johnathan Tovar
Plaintiff:
Pedro Juan Gonzalez-Pantoja and Jose M. Melendez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pantoja v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2015cv05051
Plaintiff:
Mario Pantoja
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Blas Juria Lozano, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Mora et al v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00178
Defendant:
Ruth Beltran Esquivel, G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc., Gelco Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Juventino Castro, Rosa Diaz, Miguel Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Pantoja v. Zapata et al
as 1:2007cv00590
Plaintiff:
William Pantoja and William Pantoja
Defendant:
Juliana Zapata and Marta Rincon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
