Cases 1 - 10 of 6,700
Monzon v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
Raul Cardenas Monzon
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Preston v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Alexis Preston
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Campbell v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Candice Lindsay Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Ji et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Quanyue Ji
Defendant:
United States of America, Christina Martinez and Charles Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Vargas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hogberg et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Travis Hogberg and Audrey Rodriguez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Young v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
Queen Young
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Terry v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Terry
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rocha v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Blas Jesse Rocha, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rosado v. United State of America
as 0:2024cv60822
Plaintiff:
Oscar Rosado
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
