Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAUSHVILI v. APH QUALITY TRANSPORT LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07158
Plaintiff:
RAMIN DAUSHVILI
Cross Claimant:
APH QUALITY TRANSPORT LLC and JOSHUA JAMIL
Cross Defendant:
JOHN DOES A-Z and arbtre
Defendant:
XYZ COMPANIES 1-10,SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS, THE TRUE IDENTITIES BEING PRESENTLY UNKNOWN and XYZ COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
WORTHY v. HOOD et al
as 3:2020cv09306
In Re:
arbtre
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, GARY HOOD, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC WORTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MCMILLIAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2019cv04624
Defendant:
JOHN DOE I-V, HERMAN BARON, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
In Re:
arbtre
Plaintiff:
MARK MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BAKALI v. JONES et al
as 2:2017cv01162
Arbitrator:
arbtre
Plaintiff:
ABDUR RAUF BAKALI
Defendant:
GLENN A. JONES , EAGLE EXPRESS LINES, INC and ABC CORPS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUGHLEY v. ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00730
Plaintiff:
JOYCE HUGHLEY
Defendant:
ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. , DENNIS NORWOOD , JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SUERO et al v. WHEELER et al
as 4:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Francisco Suero and Maria Suarez
Defendant:
Philip M Wheeler, Werner Enterprises , James D. Barry and others
Arbitrator:
arbtre
Cross_claimant:
Werner Enterprises and James D. Barry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ron-Sanchez v. Ramos
as 1:2013cv07069
Defendant:
Gaspar E. Ramos
Plaintiff:
Carlos L. Ron-Sanchez
Arbitrator:
arbtre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barbosa v. McGorman et al
as 1:2013cv01460
Plaintiff:
Rafael Barbosa
Cross Claimant:
Jason D. Mcgorman
Defendant:
Jason D. Mcgorman and Dewar Richard
Cross Defendant:
Dewar Richard
Arbitrator:
arbtre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
