Cases 11 - 20 of 48
O.A Mong v. Srgt 6441 et al
as 1:2021cv04507
Plaintiff:
Agwu O.A Mong
Defendant:
Srgt 6441, Srgt Kerkoski, Srg Munoz and others
Mong v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2021cv02450
Defendant:
City of Chicago Department of Building, Steven Q McKenzie and Community Intiatives, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Agwu O.A Mong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mong v. City Of Chicago Police Dept
as 1:2021cv02423
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Dept
Plaintiff:
Agwu O.A Mong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Austin Bey v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00611
Defendant:
Ahmad Mohammed, City Of Chicago and Suzanne Niemoth
Plaintiff:
Travis Austin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eikosidekas v. Chicago Union Station Company et al
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Chicago Union Station Company, Metra, The City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Anthoula Eikosidekas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Department of Police et al
as 1:2020cv03734
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Department of Police, Bernadette Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Marco-Dane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
R. v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv08145
Defendant:
Legal Prep Charter Academies, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO and Jamel M. Helaire-Jones
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendez v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06313
Defendant:
Christopher Szczurs, City of Chicago, Unknown Officers of the Chicago Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osmolski v. Walsh Construction Company et al
as 1:2018cv04889
Plaintiff:
Karen Osmolski
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Walsh Construction Company II, LLC and Walsh Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Avant v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv02145
Plaintiff:
Venus Avant
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, D. Perez and H. Betancourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
