Cases 11 - 20 of 26
LAPIDES et al v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv01173
Plaintiff:
GOLDIE LAPIDES and SAMUEL LAPIDES
Defendant:
SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cronic et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2011cv04108
Plaintiff:
Goldie Faye Cronic and William Ted Cronic
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KENNEDY v. TJX COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv05115
Plaintiff:
GOLDIE KENNEDY
Defendant:
TJX COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: World Trade Center Lowe
as 11-411
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Richard Racioppi, Alex Anthony Sanchez, Rafael Valdez and others
Claimant - Appellant:
Truzzolino Barbra, Dorothy Dambakly, Richard Dambakly and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Tully Construction Co., Inc., City of New York and others
In Re: World Trade Center Lowe
as 10-4353
Claimant - Appellant:
Richard Dambakly, Dorothy Dambakly, Edward Deery and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Tully Construction Co., Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Lockwood Kessler & Bartlett, Inc. and others
Hay v. Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C et al
as 6:2010cv01464
Plaintiff:
Goldie Hay
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jack v. Tassin
as 6:2009cv01601
Plaintiff:
Goldie Mae Jack
Defendant:
John A Tassin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jack v. Tassin
as 6:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Goldie Mae Jack
Defendant:
John A Tassin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
v. Tassin
as 2:2009cv01601
Plaintiff:
Goldie Mae Jack
Defendant:
John A Tassin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jack v. C V S Pharmacy
as 2:2009cv00961
Plaintiff:
Goldie Mae Jack
Defendant:
C V S Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
