Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Goux v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
as 2:2024cv02093
Plaintiff:
Sariah Goux
Defendant:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Geppert v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05763
Plaintiff:
Rohno Geppert
Defendant:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc., a Utah corporation sole, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc. NKA The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Inc.; a Utah Corporation sole, Corporation of the President of the San Jose Stake of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a California corporation sole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jane DK Doe v. Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 5:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Jane DK Doe
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Does 1 to 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
John CL Doe v. Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al
as 5:2023cv02005
Plaintiff:
John CL Doe and C. L.
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Does 1 to 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Kory J. v. Melvin Kay Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv05273
Plaintiff:
Kory J.
Defendant:
melvin kay johnson, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the President of the California Los Angeles Mission, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
v. Acts 2:38 Faith Deliverance, Inc., Church Of Jesus Christ Of The Apostolic et al
as 1:2023cv01115
Defendant:
Acts 2:38 Faith Deliverance, Inc., Church Of Jesus Christ Of The Apostolic doing business as Faith Deliverance Apostolic Church, First Apostolic Council of Kentucky and Tennessee, Pentecostal Assemblies of the World Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hayes Jr. v. Acts 2:38 Faith Deliverance, Inc., Church Of Jesus Christ Of The Apostolic D/B/A Faith Deliverance Apostolic Church et al
as 1:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hayes Jr.
Defendant:
Acts 2:38 Faith Deliverance, Inc., Church Of Jesus Christ Of The Apostolic D/B/A Faith Deliverance Apostolic Church, First Apostolic Council of Kentucky and Tennessee d/b/a First Apostolic Council, Pentecostal Assemblies of the World Inc. d/b/a PAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hayes v. ACTS 2:38 FAITH DELIVERANCE, INC., CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF THE APOSTOLIC et al
as 1:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hayes
Defendant:
ACTS 2:38 FAITH DELIVERANCE, INC., CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF THE APOSTOLIC, First Apostolic Council of Kentucky and Tennessee, Pentecostal Assemblies of the World Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hiser v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 6:2021cv00280
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff:
David Hiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe 1 et al v. Council et al
as 1:2020cv00497
Defendant:
Grand Teton Council, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Doe 8, Mark Doe 1, Mark Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
