Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Ronald Baugh v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-35798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD M. BAUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, former United States Attorney General, in his official capacity, ALBERTO GONZALES, former United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Ronald Baugh v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-35852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD M. BAUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES, former United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Ronald Baugh v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-35583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD M. BAUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES, former United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Estela Lebron v. Donald Rumsfeld
as 11-6480
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES OTSTOTT, Lieutenant General, USA (Ret.), EUGENE R. FIDELL, Lieutenant Commander, USCG (Ret.), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTELA LEBRON, for herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Jose Padilla and JOSE PADILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHERINE T. HANFT, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, MELANIE A. MARR, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Former Secretary of Defense and others
Defendant:
CRAIG NOBLE, Dr., MACK D. KEEN, Senior Chief Consolidated Brig, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Former Attorney General and others
Moore v. Mukasey
as 4:2008cv01923
Plaintiff:
Walter Moore
Defendant:
Michael B Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chawla v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jay Chawla
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael O Leavitt, Condoleezza Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
