Cases 1 - 10 of 13
GRATION et al vs. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2021cv01859
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Plaintiff:
JUDITH ELLEN GRATION, JONATHAN SCOTT GRATION, JR., BARRY GORDON BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Blue v. Van Orsdall
as 2:2020cv10439
Defendant:
Doug Van Orsdall
Plaintiff:
Sexual Sin De Un Abdul Blue
Lee et al v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
Un Lee , A. C. , E.C. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lee et al
as 2:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
Un Lee, Alexander Cheung, Evan Cheung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Blue v. River Rouge, City of et al
as 2:2016cv10526
Plaintiff:
Sexual Sin De Un Adbul Blue
Defendant:
River Rouge, City of , River Rouge Police Department , Otis and others
WHIGUM v. USA et al.
as 3:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM
Defendant:
USA, FL, DOJ AG ERIC HOLDER JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lopez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C. , Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust , Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Somkieta et al
as 1:2011cv03158
Plaintiff:
Cynthia King
Defendant:
Zongo Somkieta and UN Mission of Guinea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pamela Goodman v. Staples The Office Superstore,, et al
as 10-15021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA GOODMAN, un unmarried individual
Defendant - Appellee:
STAPLES THE OFFICE SUPERSTORE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and DOES, I-X
LEE et al v. LA FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
as 2:2009cv04430
Plaintiff:
JUNG UN LEE and DUK BOK LEE
Defendant:
LA FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
