Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Arnold et al v. U.S. Well Services, LLC
as 2:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold and Maria Echeverria
Defendant:
U.S. Well Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lester et al v. C&J Well Services, Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lester and Robin Lester
Defendant:
C&J Well Services, Inc , Noble Energy, Inc. , Consol Energy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Well v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv01781
Plaintiff:
Francis Russell Well
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv04037
Plaintiff:
Michael Grandville Wells
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv04035
Plaintiff:
Bonnie May Wells
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Well v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01966
Plaintiff:
Amber Lee Well
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27187
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lynn Wells
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vankirk v. Superior Well Services, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joshua Vankirk
Defendant:
Superior Well Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Campomanes v. Mason et al
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Angelica Campomanes
Defendant:
David R. Mason and Mason Chiropractic Health & Wellness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cartwright et al v. Superior Well Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00298
Plaintiff:
Randall Cartwright and Jamie Cartwright
Defendant:
Superior Well Services, Inc. and Darrell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
