Cases 91 - 100 of 3,070
Melow et al v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Trista R. Melow and Dustin A. Melow
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Teresa Taylor v. USA
as 14-10091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERESA TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zhu v. Cioffi et al
as 1:2013cv07096
Defendant:
Vincent P. Cioffi, Elrac, LLC and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kailin Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Garisto et al v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2013cv02611
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Garisto , N.G. and K.G.
Defendant:
United States Of America, Delaware North Companies , Delaware North Companies Parks and Resorts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Porter v. The United States of America
as 1:2013cv07332
Plaintiff:
Maxine Porter
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
May et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv10848
Plaintiff:
George May , All Women Damaged by the Defendant's Terrorist Acts and The United States of America
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyers et al v. United States of America
as 6:2013cv01555
Plaintiff:
John Meyers and Billie Jean Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sempsrott v. United States Air Force et al
as 3:2013cv02245
Plaintiff:
David Sempsrott
Defendant:
United States Air Force and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Penrose v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01060
Plaintiff:
Jonas J. Penrose
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Carl F Von Mulldorfer v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv05564
Defendant:
Does, Dri-Steem Corporation, LM2 Construction Co Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Carl F Von Mulldorfer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
