Cases 1 - 10 of 24
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23381
Plaintiff:
MARY WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01289
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Mary Woods
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
TENNESHA ANN-MARIE WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44011
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LACY MARIE WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01233
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deno Wood
Petitioner:
Mary Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06606
Plaintiff:
Mary Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brim et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00229
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated, Combe Products, Inc., Combe International Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Brim, Joseph McGregor, Victor Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv11627
Plaintiff:
Mary Woods and William Woods
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28561
Plaintiff:
Mary Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McSpadden et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv25540
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dusty McSpadden , Deborah Johnson , Carmela Alberta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
