Cases 1 - 10 of 237
Carder et al v. Hoveround Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Carder, Beverly Ann Tanner, Raymond Glen Tanner and others
Defendant:
Hoveround Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Controls Integrated Sensing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Raymond v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02913
Plaintiff:
Michelle Raymond
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv02726
Plaintiff:
Gail M. Raymond
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyington et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01890
Plaintiff:
Deborah Boyington and Raymond Boyington
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01824
Plaintiff:
Suzette K. Landry and Raymond A. Landry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rios et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joni L. Rios and Raymond R. Rios
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrasco et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09480
Plaintiff:
Maria Carrasco and Raymond Carrasco
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv09429
Plaintiff:
Miriam Price and Raymond P. Price
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv07859
Plaintiff:
Lynne Rollins and Raymond Rollins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07297
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rivera and Raymond Rivera
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
