Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Naythan Ward, et al v. J.M. Smucker Company
as 24-3387
Plaintiff:
NAYTHAN A. WARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOE PISCIOTTI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CAMERON BOPP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY
Naythan Ward, et al v. J.M. Smucker Company
as 24-3386
Plaintiff:
NAYTHAN A. WARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOE PISCIOTTI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CAMERON BOPP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY
Messerli v. AW Distributing, et al
as 23-3241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBBIN MESSERLI, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Decedent Kyle Messerli, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
AW DISTRIBUTING, INC., AW PRODUCT SALES & MARKETING, INC., FALCON SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Steele-Warrick v. Microgenics Corporation
as 23-767
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nadezda Steele-Warrick, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Darryl Schultz
Defendant:
Microgenics Corporation, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Anthony Annucci and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Kelly
Steele-Warrick v. Microgenics Corporation
as 23-766
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nadezda Steele-Warrick, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Darryl Schultz
Defendant:
Microgenics Corporation, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Charles Kelly and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Annucci and James O'Gorman
Steele-Warrick v. Microgenics Corporation
as 23-743
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nadezda Steele-Warrick, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Darryl Schultz
Defendant:
Microgenics Corporation, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Donald Venettozzi and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Annucci, James O'Gorman, Charles Kelly and others
Commissioners of Public Works of The City of Charleston d/b/a Charleston Water System v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Defendant:
3M Company, The, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Charleston Water System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Commissioners of Public Works for The City of Charleston d/b/a Charleston Water System v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01075
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Commissioners of Public Works for The City of Charleston Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Charleston Water System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The Estate of Carson Bride, et al v. Yolo Technologies, Inc., et al
as 23-55134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF CARSON BRIDE, by and through his appointed administrator KRISTIN BRIDE, A. K., by and through her legal guardian Jane Doe 1, A. C., by and through her legal guardian Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
YOLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and LIGHTSPACE, INC.
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
