Cases 161 - 170 of 235
Hamilton v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 6:2017cv06099
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation, Stryker Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Given v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02145
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho, LLC, Bayer Healthcare, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rod Given, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stone
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02122
Plaintiff:
Steven Jones
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zimny v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv03033
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corp. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Zimny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engel v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jamie Engel
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc and Imerys Talc America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sundberg v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv04014
Plaintiff:
Valerie Sundberg
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratliff v. Davol Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00143
Plaintiff:
Freddie Ratliff
Defendant:
Davol Inc , C R Bard Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simpson et al v. Wright Medical Group Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Simpson and Elizabeth Simpson
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group Inc and Wright Medical Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caughron v. Upsher-Smith Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Virginia Caughron
Defendant:
Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc and Taro Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
