Cases 21 - 30 of 748
RUSSO et al v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03024
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC., GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK C. RUSSO and HANNAH RUSSO
Counter Defendant:
DOW SILICONES CORPORATION and GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC.
Respondent:
ABB, INC.
Petitioner:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Randolph Morton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2018cv05956
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA Inc, Union Carbide Corporation, -, CBS Corporation (f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger with CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to BF STURTEVANT) and others
Plaintiff:
Edna S. Morton and Randolph Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
PINE v. AURORA PUMP et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Cross Claimant:
STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., CARRIER CORPORATION, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., GEORGIA PACIFIC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, WARREN PUMPS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LYDIA PINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICHARDS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GEORGIA PACIFIC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO. and others
Cross Claimant:
AURORA PUMP, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G RICHARDS and GEORGETTA RICHARDS
Cross Defendant:
PEP BOYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
OCH et al v. THE PEP BOYS: MANNY, MOE & JACK et al
as 2:2017cv03982
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. OCH and BARBARA A. ZIPPI
Defendant:
THE PEP BOYS: MANNY, MOE & JACK , NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION and PENN JERSEY AUTO
Thirdparty_defendant:
THE BOEING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOLICK et al v. CBS CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv00977
Plaintiff:
LEON BOLICK and MARGARET BOLICK
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION , UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. and others
Cross_claimant:
BOEING COMPANY , GOODRICH CORPORATION , HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
CBS CORPORATION and THE GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dugger et al v. McCormick et al
as 1:2016cv03912
Plaintiff:
Dugger, John Dugger, Jr., Melody Natishin and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Hampshire Industries, Inc., The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Jenkins Valves, Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
The William Powell Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
RHOADES v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv05844
Cross Defendant:
BEAZER EAST, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., LEONA V. RHOADES and others
Defendant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF, ARVIN MERITOR and others
Counter Claimant:
BASIC, INC.
Cross Claimant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, HONEYWELL, INC., INGERSOLL-RAND & CO. and others
Respondent:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Billie Cunningham et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv03764
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corp, FMC Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Billie Cunningham and Maria Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fish v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 1:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
Fish, Robert C. Fish, Helen Thomas-Fish and others
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation of Delaware as successor to Westinghouse Electric Corp. also known as CBS Corporation doing business as Viacom, Inc., Pneumo Abex, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Akebono Brake Industry Co., Ltd. and CBS Corporation of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
