Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saad Maura, et al v. Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-1114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMARIS TORRES-NUNEZ, EVELYN MORALEZ-SUAREZ, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BERRIOS-RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO SANTANDER DE PUERTO RICO, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
WMPRRE LLC and SUNWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY INC.
Fiorani v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00004
Defendant:
T-Mobile-USA, Samsung-USA, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rosario A Fiorani and Ross Fiorani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Washington Mutual Bank v. Rosario Rojo
as 16-10434
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSARIO ROJO
Washington Mutual Bank v. Rojo
as 1:2015cv23304
Defendant:
Rosario Rojo
Plaintiff:
Washington Mutual Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Washington Mutual Bank v. Rojo
as 1:2015cv23164
Plaintiff:
Washington Mutual Bank
Defendant:
Rosario Rojo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rosario v. International Auto Mall & Leasing Center, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04059
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
International Auto Mall & Leasing Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Urbina et al v. Homeview Lending Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv00789
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Urbina and Rosario A. Urbina
Defendant:
Homeview Lending Incorporated, Desert Mortgage and Select Portfolio Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moreno et al v. Doral Financial Corp et al
as 3:2009cv01284
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Moreno, Rhina R. Rosario and Conjugal Partnership Moreno-Rosario
Defendant:
Doral Financial Corp, Doral Mortgage Corp., Doral Mortgage, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROSARIO v. GARDEN STATE MORTGAGE CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv00441
Plaintiff:
ADA ROSARIO
Defendant:
GARDEN STATE MORTGAGE CORP., LINA GRANADA, HORIZON TITLE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
