Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Iva Robbins v. Alexandria Redevelopment Housing Authority, et al
as 23-15907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. IVA ROBBINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT HOUSING AUTHORITY, QUAKER LANE LP, PHOENIX HOUSING DEPARTMENT and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Iva Robbins v. Alexandria Redevelopment Housing Authority, et al
as 23-15670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. IVA ROBBINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT HOUSING AUTHORITY, QUAKER LANE LP, PHOENIX HOUSING DEPARTMENT and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Henderson v. Lane County Circuit Court et al
as 6:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Christine Henderson
Defendant:
Lane County Circuit Court, Presiding Judge Charles Calrson, Donald E Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Henderson et al v. Full Access Brokerage FAB et al
as 6:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Patrick Louis Henderson, Christine Henderson, Angela M Peyton and others
Defendant:
Full Access Brokerage, Lane County Developmental Disabilities, Oregon Developmental Disabilities Services and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Michael Brooks v. Trillium Community Health Plan, et al
as 17-35620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. BROOKS, ex rel. United States of America; Relator
Defendant - Appellee:
TRILLIUM COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN, INC., AGATE RESOURCES, INC. and LANE INDIVIDUAL PRACTICE ASSOCIATION, INC.
v. Louisiana Children's Medical Center et al
as 2:2017cv03456
Movant:
Joshua Nemzoff
Defendant:
Louisiana Children's Medical Center, West Jefferson Holdings, LLC, Sisung Group and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Headen v. Adams and Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
Stephen Headen
Defendant:
Adams and Associates, Inc. , Lorraine Lane and Shaileen Viera
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
