Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HydroFLOW USA LLC v. ECO Integrated Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
HydroFLOW USA LLC
Defendant:
ECO Integrated Technologies, Inc., Jess Rae Booth and Walter Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Contract
Dollson et al v. T-Mobile US Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Robin Dollson, Candy Howard and Leonardo Figueroa
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile US Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ferguson et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ferguson and Brian Heinz
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Schupler v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
Stuart Schupler
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engelbretson v. Bagelcode USA Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Google Payment Corp., Bagelcode USA, Inc., Google LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Engelbretson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc v. Ogden et al
as 2:2017cv01394
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc
Defendant:
Stanley Ogden , Marcia Ogden , Eleanor O'Keefe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00895
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
EHW Constructors, Skanska USA Civil Inc., American Bridge Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. EHW Constructors et al
as 3:2016cv05475
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
EHW Constructors, Skanska USA Civil Inc., American Bridge Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ball Metal Food Container Corp. v. Schenker of Canada Limited et al
as 3:2012cv05832
Plaintiff:
Ball Metal Food Container Corp.
Defendant:
Schenker of Canada Limited, DB Schenker USA, Schenker, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Schenker, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Pacific Distribution Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington State v. AU Optronics et al
as 2:2010cv01460
Plaintiff:
Washington State
Defendant:
AU Optronics, AU Optronics Corp America, Chimei Innolux Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
