Antitrust Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of Texas et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06625
Plaintiff: The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Ohio and others
Defendant: Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harpercollins Publishers, LLC, Simon & Schuster, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Defendant: ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CO, BAXTER HEMOGLOBIN THERAPEUTICS, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF GREENE, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Interested Party: OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, LLC, EXCELLUS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, KLINE & SPECTER, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee: PHARMACIA CORPORATION, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., KREMERS URBAN DEV. CO. and others
Not Classified By Court: M. JOYCE HOWE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and others
Petitioner / Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Plaintiff: THERESE SHEPLEY, LARRY YOUNG and STATE OF VA
United States of America et al v. American Express Company et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04496
Interested Party: Individual Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221, Juniper Bank, All Plaintiffs in and others
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Not Classified By Court: Citibank, N.A., Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
Petitioner: US Airways, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc, PayPal, Inc. and others
Defendant: American Express Company, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Material Witne: Jetblue Airways Corporation
Intervenor: Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant: MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff: State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff: State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?