Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Quality Auto Painting Center v. State Farm Indemnity Company, et al
as 15-14160
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUALITY AUTO PAINTING CENTER OF ROSELLE, INC., Traded as Prestige Auto Body
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Campbell County Auto Body, In v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 15-14178
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAMPBELL COUNTY AUTO BODY, INC.
Ultimate Collision Repair, In v. State Farm Indemnity Company, et al
as 15-14162
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ULTIMATE COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
Concord Auto Body, Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 15-14180
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONCORD AUTO BODY, INC
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 15-14179
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ESURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ELEPHANT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WHITEFORD COLLISION AND REFINISHING, INC., ART WALKER AUTO SERVICES, INC., DAVID C. BROSIUS, d.b.a. Martins Auto Body Works, inc. and others
Panhandle Cleaning and Restoration, Inc. et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Cleaning and Restoration, Inc. and Master Dry LLC
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, State Farm General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capitol Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv00015
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi, Allstate Property and Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff:
Capitol Body Shop, Inc, Crystal Car Care, Inc., Smith Brothers Collision Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Parker Auto Body Inc et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co et al
as 6:2014cv06004
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Johnnies Paint & Body Shop Inc, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C and others
Defendant:
Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, American National General Insurance Co, Travelers Indemnity Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Parker Auto Body Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-15470
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, THE, AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY CO., UNITED FIRE AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROUILLETTES PAINT & BODY, LLC, BRILEYS PAINT & BODY, INC., LEJEUNES BODY WORKS, INC. and others
Southern Collision & Restorati v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-11973
Defendant / Appellee:
21ST CENTURY NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, THE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOUTHERN COLLISION & RESTORATION, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
