Cases 21 - 30 of 32
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MAN-U SERVICE CONTRACT TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv06266
Plaintiff:
MAN-U SERVICE CONTRACT TRUST FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv12517
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv12435
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05108
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MORGAN v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05097
Plaintiff:
HEATHER MORGAN
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05021
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04659
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04642
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp et al
as 3:2013cv03583
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp, IMPAX Laboratories, Inc. , Lupin Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
