Cases 41 - 50 of 3,063
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc. et al v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and Health Options Inc.
Defendant:
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Public Limited Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Pierre et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Lamartine Pierre, Mark Whitlock, Lynn-Marie Rodrigues and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Emanate Health et al v. Optum Health et al
as 2:2023cv09872
Plaintiff:
Emanate Health, Emanate Health IPA, Emanate Health Medical Group and others
Defendant:
Optum Health, Optum Health Plan of California, OptumCare Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Turner v. Athene et al
as 5:2023cv06369
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Athene, FBI Interdiction Massive & Hazardous Flight Risk Company Headquartered in Hamilton Bermuda, USSOCOM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Federal Trade Commission et al v. John Muir Health et al
as 5:2023cv05952
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and State of California
Defendant:
John Muir Health and Tenet Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
JMCG Systems International LLC et al v. Department of Justice of California et al
as 3:2023cv05990
Plaintiff:
JMCG Systems International LLC and John-Michael Gutierrez
Defendant:
Department of Justice of California, Governor's Office of California and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Sabol et al v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05100
Plaintiff:
Christian Sabol and Samanthia Russell
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc. and PayPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Marin v. Viernes et al
as 3:2023cv02118
Defendant:
Zhongguo Nanxing Doe Unknown Chinese Supplier, Corporate Entity Owned and/or Controlled by its Alter Ego the people's Republic of China (Zhongguo) also known as Zhong Fu Doe doing business as Friday Goods, Marvin Viernes, Zhong Fu Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mel Marin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015 Antitrust Litigation
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff:
Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party:
Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
