Antitrust Cases
Cases 71 - 79 of 79
THE KROGER CO. et al v. CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00889
Plaintiff: The Kroger Co., Safeway Inc., Walgreen Co. and others
Defendant: Cadbury Schweppes PLC, Cadbury Adams USA LLC, Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
State of California v. Safeway, Inc., et al
as 08-55708
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant: SAFEWAY, INC., a Safeway Company doing business as Vons, ALBERTSONS, INC., RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, a division of the Kroger Company and others
Amicus Curiae: THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHIMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE USA and others
State of California v. Safeway, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-55671
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: SAFEWAY, INC., a Safeway Company doing business as Vons, ALBERTSONS, INC., RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, a division of the Kroger Company and others
Amicus Curiae: THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHIMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE USA and others
THE KROGER CO. et al v. CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC et al
as 2:2008cv01136
Plaintiff: THE KROGER CO., SAFEWAY INC., WALGREEN CO. and others
Defendant: CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC, CADBURY ADAMS USA LLC, CADBURY ADAMS CANADA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Safeway Inc. et al v. Abbott Laboratories We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv05470
Plaintiff: Safeway Inc., Safeway Inc., Safeway Inc. and others
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Safeway Inc. et al v. Abbott Laboratories
as 3:2007cv05470
Plaintiff: Safeway Inc., Safeway Inc., Safeway Inc. and others
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant: BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner: TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
The Kroger Co. v. Mastercard Inc.
as 1:2006cv00039
Special Master: James Orenstein
Plaintiff: The Kroger Co., Albertson's, Inc., Safeway, Inc. and others
Defendant: Mastercard Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated
Amicus Curiae: U.S. Public Research Interest Group
Not Classified By Court: 1001 Property Solutions LLC, Temple Eagle Partners LLC, Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
GENERAL REFRACTORIES v. STONE CONTAINER, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1999cv01341
Plaintiff: GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY
Defendant: STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION
Respondent: PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA , MAYTAG CORPORATION , LANGER & GROGAN, P.C. and others
Movant: CREST MEAT CO., INC. , FARMLAND FOODS, INC. , USG CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?