Antitrust Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10462
Plaintiff: Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103 I.B.E.W. and San Bernardino County Employees' Retirement Association
Defendant: Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. (f/k/a Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank U.A.) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06221
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System, Orange County Employees Retirement System, Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Association and others
Interested Party: Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC and Two Sigma Investments, LP
Petitioner: SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Deutsche Bank AG and Joseph Santoro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05095
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Defendant: Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant: Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant: Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party: Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff: Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant: BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant: Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re: Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015md02673
Plaintiff: Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Robert L. Teel and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: American Federation of Teachers, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, Rogers Varner, Jr. and others
Defendant: TD Securities (USA) LLC, Jeffries LLC, Barclays Bank, PLC and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund, University of Puerto Rico Retirement System, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and others
Consolidated Defendant: Bank of America Corp. and John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Petitioner: Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04563
Plaintiff: The City of Philadelphia
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?