Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Lutz v. HomeServices of America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv10040
Plaintiff:
James Lutz
Defendant:
HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and HSF Affiliates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
PDVSA US Litigation Trust, et al v. Lukoil Pan Americas LLC, et al
as 22-10675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PDVSA US LITIGATION TRUST
Intervenor:
PETROLEOS DE VENEZUELA, S.A. (PDVSA)
Defendant / Appellee:
LUKOIL PAN AMERICAS LLC, LUKOIL PETROLEUM LTD, COLONIAL OIL INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
PDVSA US Litigation Trust v Lukoil Pan Americas LLC et al
as 1:2018cv20818
Plaintiff:
PDVSA US Litigation Trust
Defendant:
Lukoil Pan Americas LLC , Lukoil Petroleum Ltd, Colonial Oil Industries Inc. and others
Material_witne:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Gallagher et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02613
Plaintiff:
JOHN GALLAGHER , Richard Holden and Gerald Lutz
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and RANBAXY INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gallagher et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10517
Plaintiff:
John Gallagher , Richard Holden and Gerald Lutz
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Warner-Lambert Company and Ranbaxy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
