Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv05840
Plaintiff:
Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv06610
Plaintiff:
Motorola, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Golden Brdg Technol v. Nokia Inc, et al
as 07-40954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY INC
Defendant - Appellee:
NOKIA INC, MOTOROLA INC, T-MOBILE USA INC and others
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Nokia, Inc. et al
as 2:2005cv00170
Not Classified By Court:
Harlan A Martin
Plaintiff:
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Nokia, Inc., Motorola Inc, T-Mobile USA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
