Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Live Nation Entertainment Inc v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff: Live Nation Entertainment Inc
Defendant: Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company afent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff: United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Other: Brad Greenspan
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff: JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff: Mishanta Reyes
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
The State Of Texas, et al v. Google, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06841
Plaintiff: The State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Idaho and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff: Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party: The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?