Cases 81 - 90 of 178
Oh v. Pacific International Bank et al
as 2:2011cv01509
Plaintiff:
Joseph Oh
Defendant:
Pacific International Bank , Woosung Park , James Alfred Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
PIAZZA v. MIFFLINBURG BANK AND TRUST COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv05526
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER PIAZZA
Defendant:
MIFFLINBURG BANK AND TRUST COMPANY , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nathan v. Matlock et al
as 3:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Amy Nathan
Defendant:
Joe Matlock and John Doe 1, 2, 3 unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Sucec v. Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of Chambersburg et al
as 1:2011cv01509
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sucec
Defendant:
Farmers and Merchants Trust Company of Chambersburg , John Does (1-10) and XYZ Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
56 Walker, LLC et al v. MB Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05512
Plaintiff:
56 Walker, LLC , Guy Morris and Inn World Report, Inc.
Defendant:
MB Financial, Inc., MB Financial Bank, N.A., Broadway Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. 56 Walker, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv05538
Plaintiff:
MB Financial Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
56 Walker, LLC , Guy Morris , Wexford/HPC Mortgage Fund, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tinsley et al v. ATM Network, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00740
Plaintiff:
Donald Tinsley and Cherie Tinsley
Defendant:
ATM Network, Inc. and John Doe 1, 2, 3 unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Binkovich et al v. Barthelmy et al
as 5:2011cv03774
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Binkovich
Defendant:
Barthelmy, Grohndahl, Panighetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. U.S. Alliance Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00713
Plaintiff:
Tim Norman
Defendant:
U.S. Alliance Group, Inc. and John Doe 1, 2, 3 unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
