Cases 91 - 100 of 4,257
Carrillo v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Unknown Party, Pam Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Aguilar v. Innovative Funding Services
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Deyra Pamela Carranza Aguilar
Defendant:
Innovative Funding Services doing business as Tresl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carrillo v. eBay Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
eBay Incorporated, U.S. Bank, Western State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gethsemani Baptist Church v. San Luis, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Gethsemani Baptist Church
Defendant:
San Luis, City of, Nieves G Riedel, Jenny Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Human Services Campus Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Graven v. Snow et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
William A Graven
Defendant:
G Murray Snow, Mary H Murguia, John C Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert W Robinson
Defendant:
Carol A Robinson and Tami P Sexton
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 3005 Detention of Mail for Temporary Periods
Scott v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mangus v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Teresa Mangus
Defendant:
Joseph Kiefer and Stasy Avelar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
