Cases 101 - 108 of 108
Riley v. Childersburg, City of et al
as 1:2008cv00549
Plaintiff:
Renatta Jane Riley
Defendant:
Childersburg, City of, Charles Brown, Chris Wycoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bankhead et al v. Gadsden Police Department, City of et al
as 4:2007cv01040
Plaintiff:
Isaac Bankhead, Monique Lucas, Johnny King and others
Defendant:
Gadsden Police Department, City of, C A Crisler and Doug Sykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. City of Huntsville, Alabama et al
as 5:2007cv01013
Plaintiff:
Joe Brown and Shaun Sonia
Defendant:
City of Huntsville, Alabama, Gerald L Norris, J Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Lawrence County, Alabama et al
as 5:2007cv01011
Plaintiff:
Clyde O'Neal Parker
Defendant:
Lawrence County, Alabama, Gene Mitchell, Kenneth Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordell v. Hadder et al
as 6:2007cv00789
Plaintiff:
Landon Cordell
Defendant:
Adam Hadder, Brown, Steve Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. City of Childersburg, Alabama et al
as 1:2007cv00377
Plaintiff:
Renatta Jane Riley
Defendant:
City of Childersburg, Alabama, Charles L Brown, Chris Wycoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green et al v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2007cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Green, Johnny Brown and Aletha Johnson
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, J. J. Allen and Henry Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KPL et al v. Alabama State Board of Human Resources et al
as 2:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
KPL and Karl Randolph Lentz
Defendant:
Alabama State Board of Human Resources, Bob Riley, Alabama Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
