Cases 121 - 130 of 5,232
Reinhardt v. City of Chesterfield Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reinhardt
Defendant:
City of Chesterfield Missouri, Lance Rouse and Gregory Rupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobson v. Hays
as 4:2023cv01591
Plaintiff:
Yule Hobson
Defendant:
Heather Jacquel Hays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Together Credit Union
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Allen Simmons
Defendant:
Together Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hobson v. Santino
as 4:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Yule Hobson
Defendant:
Micheac Santno and Micheal Santino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cambell v. Hyatt et al
as 4:2023cv01547
Plaintiff:
Lamont Cambell
Defendant:
Jimmy Hyatt, Michael Pratt, John Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.C. et al v. Curators of the University of Missouri
as 2:2023cv04216
Plaintiff:
J. C. and K. J.
Defendant:
Curators of the University of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Sims et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Martin D Hendrix
Defendant:
Deputy Ryland T Sims, Deputy A. Quick and Ray County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacobs, Jr. v. Schuster et al
as 2:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Alfred Eugene Jacobs, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant Turner Schuster, Officer Gardner Pottorff, City of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Phillips v. Drago et al
as 4:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Ryan Drago and Carlos Phillips
Defendant:
City of St. Louis and Ryan J. Drago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpenter v. Westin Hotel et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Charles Carpenter
Defendant:
Westin Hotel, Alida Poston, Latrina Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
