Cases 121 - 130 of 3,330
Wright v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. Wright
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Jodie A. Bureta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brooks v. Fowler et al
as 6:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Brooks
Defendant:
Heather Deschamps Fowler, Matthew Jason Fowler and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Ray v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Ahbinesh Ray
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Hasty v. US Forest Service et al
as 6:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Barry Hasty
Defendant:
US Forest Service and Thomas J. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vance v. Sheqan et al
as 6:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Vance
Defendant:
Diana Sheqan, Carel Sheqan, Harold Sheqan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boysen et al v. Peacehealth et al.
as 6:2023cv01229
Plaintiff:
Sara Boysen, Hannah Bernhardt, Alisha Carter and others
Defendant:
PeaceHealth, Liz Dunne, Doug Koekkoek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cato v. Club Rouge Portland et al
as 3:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Kealand Cato
Defendant:
Club Rouge Portland, Rouge Portland LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Weybright v. County of Marion et al
as 6:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Brogan M. Weybright
Defendant:
County of Marion, John Doe, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Wright et al
as 2:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Bill Wright, Darla Huxel, City of Umatilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
