Cases 131 - 140 of 4,260
Nakanwagi v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2023cv08610
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Force v. Brazeau
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Shawn H Force
Defendant:
Nicholas J Brazeau, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snyder v. Puerco Valley Fire District et al
as 3:2023cv08636
Defendant:
Randall Anselmo, Puerco Valley Fire District, Toni Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Cliff Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mace v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2023cv02426
Plaintiff:
Kelley Justin Mace
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Michael P Santosassimo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Airbnb Incorporated
as 2:2023cv02541
Plaintiff:
Alex Smith
Defendant:
Airbnb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dominique Antaune White and Dominique A White
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Phoenix Veterans Affairs Healthcare Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Desert Financial Credit Union
as 2:2023cv02322
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones and Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Desert Financial Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maldonado v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Maldonado
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, Aimee Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. BMO Harris Bank NA
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank NA and BMO Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cestro v. Snowflake Justice Court
as 3:2023cv08608
Plaintiff:
Dominick Cestro
Defendant:
Snowflake Justice Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
