Cases 141 - 150 of 1,132
Caldwell, Sr. v. Roberts et al
as 3:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keith R. Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant:
John Roberts, William H. Pryor, Jr., Mary S. Scriven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wells, III v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
John C. Wells, III
Defendant:
William Lee, David Rausch and Frank Strada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCurry v. McDonough et al
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
Travis McDonough, Kenny Armstrong, Andy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hux v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Brian Eugene Hux
Defendant:
Randall Williams, Knox County Tennessee and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Simpson v. AT&T Mobility et al
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Brenda-Joyce Simpson
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, Randel Stephenson and John Stankey
Ward v. George et al
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Casey L Ward
Defendant:
Shane George, Steven Daugherty, John T Lasater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bing et al
as 3:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Eric Todd Jackson
Defendant:
Christy Arwood Bing, Edward E. DeWerff, John W. Carrey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spann et al v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
William A. Spann and Marty Spann
Defendant:
Ed Carter, Mitchell Bailey, Dale Grandstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Tansley et al
as 2:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roy Robinson
Defendant:
Dominique Tansley, Catrina Crabtree and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
