Cases 151 - 160 of 2,977
Holmes v. Minnesota DOC et al
as 0:2023cv02969
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Minnesota DOC, State of MN, Joan Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdi v. Rupp
as 0:2023cv02925
Plaintiff:
Yonis Abdi
Defendant:
Jason Rupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdi v. Jassen
as 0:2023cv02924
Plaintiff:
Yonis Abdi
Defendant:
Heather Jassen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez Ramirez v. Federal Government
as 0:2023cv02944
Plaintiff:
Cosme Sanchez Ramirez
Defendant:
Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 0:2023cv03334
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03330
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Reese McKinney, Unidentified Probate Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Awaijane et al v. Bittell et al
as 0:2023cv02892
Plaintiff:
Assad Awaijane, Robert Awaijane, Anisse Campbell and others
Defendant:
Andrew Bittell, Michael Osbeck, Jr., Christopher Cushenbery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bergeron v. Ramsey County Courts et al
as 0:2023cv02850
Plaintiff:
Dominique Elise Bergeron
Defendant:
Ramsey County Courts, Sara R Grewing, Judge Laura Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 0:2023cv03081
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Patrick D. Smith and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schieffer v. City of East Gull Lake, Minnesota
as 0:2023cv02937
Plaintiff:
Douglas Schieffer
Defendant:
City of East Gull Lake, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
