Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Ahmad-El v. Fekete et al
as 2:2012cv00405
Plaintiff: Nasir Ahmad-El
Defendant: S.J. Fekete, C. Bryant and Badge # 19877
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Desetti et al v. County of Augusta, Virginia et al
as 5:2012cv00071
Defendant: Lt. Dennis Back, R Boylan, Deputy Jesse Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Joel Desetti and Judy Desetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates v. Nunley et al
as 3:2012cv00269
Defendant: Bryant Gumbel, Wachovia Bank/Wells Fargo, Chief Of Police and others
Plaintiff: Hephzibah Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. McCormack et al
as 3:2012cv00096
Plaintiff: Kevin Maurice Edwards
Defendant: Timothy J. McCormack, Jr., Vernon Michael Yerby and Doug Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manship, Sr. v. Wetsel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00030
Defendant: Marc Abrams, James K. Bailous, Randy Bryant and others
Plaintiff: James Renwick Manship, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dickson v. Jones et al
as 4:2010cv00096
Plaintiff: John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant: Bonnie L. Jones, Bryant Sugg, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Botkin v. Fisher et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00058
Plaintiff: Gerald M. Botkin
Defendant: Randall Fisher and J. F. Bryant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both
Root v. County of Fairfax et al
as 1:2008cv00498
Plaintiff: Louise Root
Defendant: County of Fairfax, Michelle McCall, Pameal Schmoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Wagner v. The Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff: Kenneth L. Wagner, II
Defendant: The Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Creighton-Bey,, Smith, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?