Cases 11 - 20 of 21
MILLER v. STEELE-SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv00662
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. MILLER
Defendant:
CAROL STEELE-SMITH , SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS , VARIOUS JOHN AND JANE DOE MEDICAL STAFF AND PRISON OFFICERS/OFFICIALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRIMBLE v. BEAVER COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS
as 2:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY E. TRIMBLE
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORNTON v. HENS-GRECO et al
as 2:2014cv01469
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THORNTON
Defendant:
KATHRYN M. HENS-GRECO, ROBERT J. MASTERS, NICOLE DICCICCIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOUSE v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv00810
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FOUSE
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY , WILLIAM SCHOUPPE and MARIO MONAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURKETT v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
MARY PATRICIA BURKETT
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY and HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF SEWICKLEY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
MCKEE v. MUSSER et al
as 2:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MCKEE
Defendant:
LORI MUSSER, CARL DECHELLIS and BEAVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROMIG v. BEAVER COUNTY, PA
as 2:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
DALE LAWRENCE ROMIG
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RETTER v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. RETTER
Defendant:
GREGORY K. DOUGLAS, TERRY J. MITKO and THE COUNTY OF BEAVER, BEAVER COUNTY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS DIVISIONS, BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROMIG v. BEAVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
as 2:2009cv01105
Plaintiff:
DALE LAWRENCE ROMIG
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PFEIFFER v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2009cv00968
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PFEIFFER
Defendant:
COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BEAVER COUNTY and GLENN EATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
