Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Clermont v. Elfo et al
as 2:2018cv01489
Defendant:
Daniel Parsons, Hanna Sullivan, Bill Elfo and others
Plaintiff:
Emil Clermont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Evans v. Heimann et al
as 3:2018cv05473
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Evans
Defendant:
Brian Heimann, Jane Doe Heimann, Bill Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elliott v. Mason County et al
as 3:2017cv06067
Plaintiff:
Megan Elliott
Defendant:
Mason County , Casey Salisbury , Jim Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bettys vs State of Washington et al
as 3:2017cv05501
Plaintiff:
John E Bettys
Defendant:
State of Washington, State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, William VanHook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ford v. Pend Oreille County et al
as 2:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Christine K Ford
Defendant:
Pend Oreille County Sheriff's Department , Pend Oreille County , Alan Botzheim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bester v. Gates et al
as 2:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Bester
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Microsoft and AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Dueball et al
as 2:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Eugene A Smith
Defendant:
Christopher M Dueball and Automotive & Industrial Distributors of Billings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingram v. City of Pasco et al
as 4:2015cv05045
Plaintiff:
Gordy Ingram
Defendant:
City of Pasco, Pasco Police Department, Brad Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marks v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tommy S Marks
Defendant:
State of Washington , Jay Inslee , John Cheeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Moses Lake Irrigation & Rehabilitation Dist et al
as 2:2014cv00357
Respondent:
Moses Lake Irrigation & Rehabilitation Dist , Ron Covey , Mary Perry and others
Petitioner:
Michael Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
